Current Investment Rankings

Rankings are market-specific until the underlying research uses sufficiently comparable price dates, forecasts and scoring. Business quality, valuation and expected return remain separate judgments.

Highest SGX expected return

Food Empire

11%–14% base-case IRR, supported by organic growth and net cash.

Highest SGX business quality

Food Empire

4.4/5 quality score. Quality ranking is independent of the current entry price.

Strongest SGX valuation score

Sembcorp Industries

4.5/5 valuation score, with company-specific balance-sheet risk considered separately.

SGX

Singapore Growth & Income Ranking

As of 16 August 2026 · Three-to-five-year horizon · Dated prices, not live quotes

Open SGX market page →
RankCompanyPriceBase IRRQualityValuationPortfolio roleViewWhy this rank
1Food Empire
F03
S$2.4211%–14%4.4/53.8/5Growth compounder / selective accumulationAccumulate selectivelyStill the best published SGX balance of organic growth and balance-sheet quality after 1H2026, but margin and cash conversion are now watch items. Selective accumulation is preferred until Kazakhstan contribution and operating leverage are visible.
2Sembcorp Industries
U96
S$5.3612%–16%4/54.5/5Value and growthAccumulateLowest normalized earnings multiple and meaningful rerating potential, offset by Alinta integration and elevated leverage.
3UltraGreen.ai
ULG / UGS
S$1.5310%–14%4.4/53.6/5Healthcare growth compounderAccumulate selectivelyHigh-margin regulated ICG consumables and net cash support growth, but distributor concentration, unproven software economics and a still-full multiple keep it below the top two.
4Singtel
Z74
S$4.4410%–12%4.4/53.2/5Defensive coreBuy on weaknessHighest defensive quality and strong associates, but the current SOTP discount and yield offer less upside than the top two.
5Stoneweg Europe Stapled Trust
SET / SEB
€1.5510%–14%3.6/54.2/5High-income satelliteSelective buyHighest cash yield and a material NAV discount, but gearing and European office exposure require smaller sizing.
6Alpha Integrated REIT
M1GU
S$0.52010%–12%3.7/53.5/5Recovery income / selective accumulationAccumulate selectively; prefer below S$0.50 ex-DPU1H2026 validated the recovery with roughly 10% normalized distributable-income and DPU growth, 95% occupancy and lower financing cost. Moderate leverage improves risk-adjusted appeal, but near-NAV pricing and concentration limit rerating upside.
7AIMS APAC REIT
O5RU
S$1.666%–9%4/52.2/5Quality incomeWatch below S$1.55Strong operating quality, but the premium to NAV and lower yield leave the weakest current expected return.
KRXCompany coverage active

Korea ranking pending

1 current company page is published: FnGuide (064850). It is deliberately not labelled rank 1 because a one-company table would not answer a capital-allocation question.

Current FnGuide view

  • Accumulate selectively at ₩18,810 (14 Aug 2026).
  • Modeled base-case IRR: 17%–22%.
  • Attractive index/data economics, but ETF-AUM cyclicality and Hwacheon/Kwon governance keep the company below A+ for now.

Required before ranking publication

  • Refresh additional Korea companies under the same Value-up and governance framework.
  • Use comparable price and forecast dates.
  • Normalize earnings, excess cash and shareholder returns consistently.
  • Score controlling-shareholder alignment separately from business quality.
View current Korea research →
JPXCompany coverage active

Japan ranking pending

1 current company page is published: Japan Elevator Service Holdings. It is not labelled rank 1 because a one-company table would not answer a capital-allocation question.

Required before ranking publication

  • Refresh several additional Japan companies.
  • Use comparable price and forecast dates.
  • Normalize earnings and scoring consistently.
  • Record portfolio roles and yen sensitivity.
View current Japan research →
USCompany coverage active

US ranking pending

1 current company page is published: S&P Global. It is not labelled rank 1 because no peer has yet been refreshed using the same post-spin, cash-flow and price assumptions.

Required before ranking publication

  • Refresh additional US compounders and financial platforms.
  • Use a disclosed common price date.
  • Normalize acquisition amortisation, stock compensation and free cash flow.
  • Apply consistent quality, downside and thesis-clarity scores.
View current US research →

How a market ranking is determined

  • Expected shareholder return at the dated entry price.
  • Business quality and durability of the earnings engine.
  • Valuation using the metric appropriate to the business.
  • Balance-sheet risk and plausible downside.
  • Portfolio role, concentration and currency exposure.

When a global ranking becomes valid

A cross-market ranking should be published only after SGX, JPX, KRX and US research has comparable freshness and portfolio assumptions. Until then, the site avoids presenting a false global league table.

Ranking versus comparison

Rankings provide a current capital-allocation order within a defined universe. Comparisons are deeper decision studies explaining why one company is preferred to another under specific assumptions.

Open the comparison library →